- From: Pablo Fernicola <pablofe@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 01:02:12 -0700
- To: "Dan Dennedy" <DDennedy@digitalbang.com>, "Sigurd Lerstad" <sigler@bredband.no>, <www-smil@w3.org>
If you look at the bottom of this page, http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/behaviors/reference/time2_entry.asp, under Methods you will see one implementation of a DOM for SMIL 2, released with Internet Explorer 6. The purpose of this was to make it easier to create SMIL based authoring tools. -Pablo -----Original Message----- From: Dan Dennedy [mailto:DDennedy@digitalbang.com] Sent: Mon 7/29/2002 7:15 AM To: Sigurd Lerstad; www-smil@w3.org Cc: Subject: RE: SMIL DOM > From: Sigurd Lerstad > > I read in the past that the SMIL dom was discontinuted > because of lack of interest. I was interested and had started > implementing it. It's really annoying that it's gone, because > as an implementor, it's really helpful to have defined > interfaces to follow instead of inventing interfaces on your own. > > I really hope that you can put it back up, even if you stop > working on it for a while... It's still available (for now) at http://www.w3.org/TR/smil-boston-dom/. I suggest you download the PDF in case the page really does goes away and expires from Google's cache. I too am working on an implementation, for the open source video editor Kino: http://www.schirmacher.de/arne/kino/ We use SMIL in an unusual way--as a post-production project file format, and not as a playback language. We are just getting started, and will probably only use this for some ideas. So far, we only use seq and video elements as a "playlist," but we need to expand now. Consequently, we need to more formalize our classes.
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 04:02:45 UTC