W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-smil@w3.org > October to December 2000

RE: 3GPP-T-WG3 codecs

From: thierry michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:24:11 +0100
Message-ID: <0cd601c06414$e7fb6630$228a608a@inria.fr>
To: <www-smil@w3.org>
Cc: "Glenn Parsons" <gparsons@nortelnetworks.com>
RE: 3GPP-T-WG3 codecs
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Glenn Parsons 
  To: Philipp Hoschka 
  Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org ; www-smil@w3.org ; IETF VPIM List 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 2:16 AM
  Subject: [Moderator Action] RE: 3GPP-T-WG3 codecs

    Patrik Fältström a écrit : 
    > At 14.39 -0500 00-12-07, Philipp Hoschka wrote: 
    > >In general, I'm a bit confused about the request - why would the 
    > >IETF have to comment on the minimal set of codecs in a format 
    > >defined by another organisation ? This would make sense if the 
    > >goal is to define a minimal set of codecs that need to be supported 
    > >by MIME mail readers, but otherwise, I don't see the point - am 
    > >I missing something ? 
    > Because they want to have the same codecs in the other organization 
    > as we define for use in the IETF I guess. 

    Sounds reasonable, but in which effort does the IETF define minimally 
    required codecs for a format ? If such an effort exists, I guess we'd 
    be interested to use the same codecs as well. 

  In the VPIM WG we defined the baseline audio codec for voice mail system interoperability.  It is G.726 for VPIM v2.  For IVM the choice is currently MS-GSM but may be changed to G.711.

  In the Fax WG, they defined the baseline image format.  It is TIFF-S for simple mode. 
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 03:24:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:46:57 UTC