- From: Philipp Hoschka <hoschka@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 16:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-smil@w3.org
(last call comment) The transitions draft currently specifies no method that allows to avoid nameclashes for "private" transistions: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-smil20-20000921/smil-transitions.html#TransitionEffects-Extending In other words, two implementations can use the same name for a new transition, but they would result in completely different transitions. This can be resolved by using a namespace-based solution, which is already used for events http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-smil20-20000921/smil20-profile.html#q21 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/
Received on Friday, 20 October 2000 19:42:30 UTC