- From: Cohen, Aaron M <aaron.m.cohen@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:00:55 -0700
- To: "'mikecote'" <mikecote@netzero.net>, www-smil@w3.org
SMIL 2.0, as we now call it is still a working draft in last call. Oratrix has release a beta based on the last call draft that can be used to learn and experiment with the language. See: http://www.oratrix.com -Aaron > -----Original Message----- > From: mikecote [mailto:mikecote@netzero.net] > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 8:45 PM > To: www-smil@w3.org > Subject: Re: SMIL comments > > > Hey, > > When will Boston-SMIL be implemented? > > Michael > > > > Fcc: sent/2000 > > > > Nick, > > > > > It would also be an immense advantage to be able to > > > 'move' regions using screen xyand z vectors. > > > > I agree. SMIL Boston supports animation of SMIL attributes, see: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/smil-boston/smil-boston-animation.html > > > > This is technique could also be used for animating region > coordinates. > > > > > Another absolute necessity to SMIL's viabilty is the possibilty to > > > change specified region content on demand without having > to reload the > > > whole screen. > > > > You're right, and this is fully supported in the current > public WD of > > SMIL-Boston, see the sections on interactive timing and the excl > > element: > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/smil-boston/smil-timing.html > > > > Regards, > > > > Jacco > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Why pay for something you could get for free? > NetZero provides FREE Internet Access and Email > http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html > >
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2000 12:01:11 UTC