- From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:26:47 +0100
- To: ned.freed@innosoft.com
- CC: ietf-types@iana.org, www-smil@w3.org
ned.freed@innosoft.com a écrit : ... > Basically it looks fine. You might want to note in the security section > that the ability to have two alternate forms of the same media is itself > a security consideration -- someone aware that two different recipients > will elect to display different forms could put different information > into each form. No problem in principle, but could you explain in some more detail what the security risk is in that case, or even suggest a wording? I would expect that in some cases putting different information may actually be desirable - such as in a switch between an audio object and a text, where the text says "cannot play audio". > The same consideration applies to multipart/alternative, BTW, and I've > already added a paragraph noting this to the MIME specification that > will appear the next time it is published. if you could point me to that text, that would be much appreciated > Ned
Received on Monday, 24 January 2000 08:28:33 UTC