- From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:58:57 +0100
- To: Dmitry Beransky <dberansky@ucsd.edu>
- CC: www-smil@w3.org
Dmitry, thanks for your feedback ! I can't come up with an answer to this off the top of my heead, but I forwarded your input to the WG for consideration. -Philipp Dmitry Beransky a écrit : > > Hi, > > Section 6.2.1 of the WD#15 says: > > "When a link into a SMIL document contains an XPointer which identifies an > element that is the content of a 'switch' element, SMIL software should > interpret this link as going to the parent 'switch' element instead. The > result of the link traversal is thus to play the 'switch' element child > that passes the usual switch child selection process." > > In a case of nested 'switch' blocks, shouldn't the control be transferred > to the top most 'switch' element instead of the parent? > > Regards > Dmitry
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 1999 06:59:08 UTC