- From: <herve_foucher@ds-fr.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 14:34:06 +0200
- To: Lloyd Rutledge <Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl>
- cc: www-smil@w3.org
Lloyd Rutledge wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21 1999 herve_foucher@ds-fr.com wrote: > > Shouldn't it be introduced in SMIL 2.0 ? > > Ideas like that are a good use of this list. How would you like to > see it encoded and processed? Herve, your insights as an implementor > would be particularly valuable. A window could be considered as a region, with an id and a type to specify that _it_is_ a window. Perhaps we could consider something as: <smil> <head> <layout> <root-layout width="200" height="200" /> <!-- coords are relative to the top left corner of the presentation --> <region id="aRealRegion" left="10" top="10" width="100" height="100" /> <!-- coords are relative to the top left corner of the screen --> <region type="window" id="aWindow" left="10" top="10" width="100" height="100" /> </layout> </head> <body> <par> <video src="foo1.mov" region="aRealRegion" dur="10s" /> <video src="foo1.html" region="aWindow" dur="10s" /> </par> </body> </smil> Thus, time model would remain the same but it is just a suggestion... ;-) > And any other suggestions, anyone? We should also add some capabilities to make regions move over the presentation. But I think Philipp Hoschka (ph@w3.org) received a lot of wishes for next SMIL versions. Philipp, could you give us a sum-up of the main ideas ? Herve
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 1999 08:35:13 UTC