- From: Budd, S. <s.budd@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:55:56 -0000
- To: "'Bryan E. Chafy'" <bchafy@ccs.neu.edu>, www-smil@w3.org
Please look at the RDF specification Resource Description Framework http://www.w3.org/Metadata/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan E. Chafy [SMTP:bchafy@ccs.neu.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 1998 9:30 PM > To: www-smil@w3.org > Subject: SMIL, TIME, or make up my own? > > I would like to know what the feasability SMIL, TIME, (other ?) > markup languages are to building a sort of common indexing or > cataloging format for media. > > On the cdwrite discussion list, > all of us agree that some sort of common format for > indexing data on a disk, tape, net-drive, etc is needed. > For example, when I create an MP3 CD-ROM or a zip disc with a buch > of images on it (or a combination of these) I want to be able to catalog > the files in some standardized way. This index/catalog should > be in a common location with a common name (like INDEX in the root > directory of the media). > > Also as well as coentent labeling, > some sort of cassification and function should be applied to the files on > the > media (for example image, video, audio, streamimage, streamtext). > For large video files data, timed track/index markers and capability > for spanning multiple media volumes are needed as well. > > I started to make up something of my own: > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/bchafy/indexer/indexer.html > but if SMIL, TIME or some other SGML/XML markup language fits the bill, > perhaps that would be better.? > > But what is better? Is any "w3c approved" language geared toward > media (think of CDI)? The language needs to be easy to parse as well. > From what I can tell, SMIL looks like the closest to what I am talking > about. > > Bryan
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 1998 04:53:06 UTC