- From: Mischa Tuffield <mischa.tuffield@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 22:14:47 +0100
- To: www-rdf-validator@w3.org
- Message-Id: <82995909-C8C8-4763-BDEA-894BF3850194@garlik.com>
This is the GET request I am talking on about : http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ARPServlet?URI=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FLondon&PARSE=Parse+URI%3A+&TRIPLES_AND_GRAPH=PRINT_TRIPLES&FORMAT=PNG_EMBED the RDF document in question being : http://dbpedia.org/resource/London Mischa On 19 May 2010, at 22:09, Mischa Tuffield wrote: > Hi, > > The RDF abstract syntax doc states that plain and typed literals are recommended to be encoded in unicode NFC. Quoting [1] > > "The string in both plain and typed literals is recommended to be in Unicode Normal Form C [NFC]. This is motivated by [CHARMOD] particularly section 4 Early Uniform Normalization. " > > This W3C RDF validator doesn't even flag the non Unicode NFC characters, am guessing the validator should flag these characters and issue "Warnings" a la libraptor. > > Mischa > mischa@mmt.me.uk > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/ > ___________________________________ Mischa Tuffield PhD Email: mischa.tuffield@garlik.com Homepage - http://mmt.me.uk/ Garlik Limited, 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44(0)7989 199 786 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 21:15:16 UTC