- From: Barclay, Daniel <daniel@fgm.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:57:09 -0400
- To: <www-rdf-validator@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4A70C5B5.6080104@fgm.com>
report=Are the seemingly duplicate arc and the duplicate triple correct? I thought that reading duplicate specifications of a triple (in a concrete form, e.g., RDF/XML) resulted in only one copy of the triple (in the abstract graph). RDF Concepts... section 3.1 says, "A set of such triples is called an RDF graph..." However, that doesn't quite say that all RDF graphs are _only_ sets (vs. a non-set, i.e., with duplicates), and doesn't define identity of triples. Section 6.2 does address the first part, saying that a graph is only a set of triples. I haven't found anything in the spec that explicitly addressed the identity of triples. However, doesn't the identity of a triple depend on only the identity of the three things in the triple and the order in which they appear in the triple? If that is correct, then the graph should not have two arcs that have the same combination of subject, predicate, and object, right? RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/"> <dc:creator> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://someone" /> </dc:creator> <dc:creator> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://someone" /> </dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> -- (Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 21:59:13 UTC