- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:16:33 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- CC: www-rdf-validator@w3.org
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, 9:14:22 PM, Martin wrote: MD> Hello Chris, MD> Many thanks for this bug report. Can you provide a pointer MD> to the actual file? I thought that the bug submission form on the validator would have included all the relevant details. Apparently not. http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/svggen/metadata-example-01-b.svg linked from http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20021112/htmlframe/full-metadata-example-01-b.html MD> Regards, Martin. MD> At 19:06 03/02/11 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote: >>report=The validator gets confused because both RDF and SVG have a version >>attribute. But if the attribute is unqualified then it belongs to the >>per-element partition and that is correct, no? >>RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2003 18:16:35 UTC