Re: RDF Validator Report

Excellent; thanks for letting us know.

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Richard H. McCullough wrote:
> Thanks, but Emmanuel Pietriga has already solved the problem for me.
> I was using a full URI instead of a fragment with rdf:ID.
>
> Dick McCullough
> knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
> knowledge haspart proposition list;
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ryan Lee" <ryanlee@w3.org>
> To: <rhm@cdepot.net>
> Cc: <www-rdf-validator@w3.org>; "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 7:50 AM
> Subject: RDF Validator Report
>
>
> > Hello Richard,
> >
> > I apologize for not replying to your report earlier, we've had some
> > personnel reassignment lately at W3C, and Eric (cc'd) and I are a little
> > new at this.
> >
> > You posted a report on the RDF Validator here:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-validator/2003Aug/0003.html
> >
> > But somehow the RDF you were checking didn't get included.  If you'd like
> > to resend a report or just reply to this message, we can try to get at the
> > root of the problem.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Ryan Lee          +1.617.253.5542 (MIT office)
> > ryanlee@w3.org    http://www.w3.org/People/ryanlee/
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Ryan Lee          +1.617.253.5542 (MIT office)
ryanlee@w3.org    http://www.w3.org/People/ryanlee/

Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 11:56:06 UTC