I recall now where I saw this RDF validation disaster: Information regarding SourceForge.net-provided RSS feeds https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=15483&group_id=1 "SourceForge.net-provided RSS feeds have been designed to be compliant with RSS 2.0 specification. These feeds have been validated using the excellent RSS Validator provided by Mark Pilgrim and Sam Ruby, the RSS Validator from UserLand and the W3C RDF Validator." Those statements are all true since the "W3C RDF Validator" will validate any XML as RDF/XML. Not really much use as a validator. Scroll to the bottom to see the use of the W3C RDF Logo applied to this non-RDF/XML, non-RDF format. DaveReceived on Monday, 7 April 2003 16:18:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 20:16:58 UTC