- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 12:22:31 +0300
- To: www-rdf-validator@w3.org
report=I have two questions: 1. Why are redundant statements in the input RDF XML present in the graph? Shouldn't these get distilled into the same body of knowledge? 2. Why are the two syntactic variants of rdf:value and property content data reflected differently in the graph? Are these not merely syntactic variants of the same graph structure? Surely this latter behavior makes it very difficult to write applications wishing to query an RDF graph -- as they must then anticipate all such syntactic artifacts remaining in the graph. Isn't this a bug? And if not, why? Thanks, Patrick Stickler Nokia Research Center patrick.stickler@nokia.com RDF=<?xml version="1.0"> <?xml version="1.0"?< <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"< <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.abc.com/history"< <dc:creator<Ernesto Sabato</dc:creator< <dc:creator<Ernesto Sabato</dc:creator< <dc:creator rdf:value="Ernesto Sabato"/< <dc:creator rdf:value="Ernesto Sabato"/< </rdf:Description< </rdf:RDF<
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2001 05:22:35 UTC