- From: Matt Williams <matthew.williams@cancer.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:42:25 +0100
- To: W3RDFLogicList <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Dear List, Firstly thanks for the swift reply to the previous query; you were of course entirely correct in that role negation posed no real problems. My next problem is in tyring to find expressions for expressing OWL-DL as a graph syntax. I have seen the AS&S documents for conversion to RDF syntax, which I need to read in some more detail. My question concerns the following problem: I want to express statements of the form: 1: "exists R(C exists R'.C')" 2: "not (exists R(C exists R'.C'))" 3: "exists R(C not exists R'.C')" I can use De Morgans law to show that 2 and 3 are equivalent to "not 1". However, I'm interested in exploring the way in which 2 and 3 are different to one another. I think I can do this by expressing the statements as a directed graph, and calculating the degree of similarity between the terms (using some suitable metric). Does anyone know of other work expressing DLs as graphs before manipulating them? I have found little in the DL Hb, Citeseer or Google. Thanks for your help, Matt -- Dr. M. Williams MRCP(UK) Clinical Research Fellow, CR-UK +44 (0) 207 269 2953 +44 (0) 7834 899570
Received on Monday, 19 September 2005 19:44:44 UTC