RE: RDF as a syntax for OWL (was Re: same-syntax extensions to RDF) from Peter Crowther on 2005-01-05 (www-rdf-logic@w3.org from January 2005)

From: Peter Crowther <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:33:11 -0000
To: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DDBBD1E00935D144AB9563D57EF98D621D63EB@raccoon.melandra.net>

> From: jos.deroo@agfa.com [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com] 
> Anyhow, what I did was simply rewriting the OWL/RDF/XML
> in RDF/N3 and then transcribe that in TSTP
[...]

In other words: What is being demonstrated is that a human has (possibly
successfully) performed a transformation task for one particular piece
of RDF/XML.  And, further, that human has chosen to go via an
intermediate representation (N3) before attempting a transcription task,
as (presumably) the original syntax is not appropriate for the TSTP
transcription?

		- Peter

Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2005 13:33:36 UTC