Re: same-syntax extensions to RDF from Graham Klyne on 2005-01-04 (www-rdf-logic@w3.org from January 2005)

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:59:52 +0000
To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20041221101424.03389088@127.0.0.1>

I am inclined to agree with those who see RDF's role as representing just 
instance data.  I've previously played with encoding some other things in 
RDF (without semantic rigor), and at the end of the day have found myself 
retreating to non-RDF encodings for reasons of pure pragmatism.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2005 10:32:06 UTC