- From: Jos de Bruijn <jos.debruijn@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:25:16 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: "www-rdf-logic@w3.org" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, all, Since this issue might be of more general interest, I am CCing the www-rdf-logic list. To give a context of this email: Peter asked me whether there is a formal syntax and semantics for WSML-Rule on the basis of my presentation of WSML-Rule at the W3C rules workshop. The syntax and semantics of WSML-Rule is defined in the WSML specification, which can be found at: http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d16/d16.1/v0.2/ The conceptual syntax is defined in Chapter 2; the logical expression syntax for WSML-Rule is defined in Chapter 6; the semantics is defined in Chapter 8. We have defined the semantics in terms of the perfect model semantics, because there was no consensus on the semantics of unstratified programs. However, we seem to converge now to the well-founded semantics, so that the next version of WSML-Rule will most likely use the well-founded semantics. Note that for locally stratified programs, the perfect model semantics and well-founded semantics coincide. Best, Jos Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Hi: > > In response to my question at the recent W3C workshop on Rule Languages for > Interoperability you indicated that there was either 1/ an adequate > definition of your candidate rule formalism for me to produce an > implementation of it that would fully interoperate with a reference > implementation or 2/ a full definition of both the syntax and semantics of > your candidate. I would greatly appreciate a pointer to this definition. > > Thank you, > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Bell Labs Research > > PS: Although this is a private email, feel free to reply in a public forum. - -- Jos de Bruijn, http://www.uibk.ac.at/~c703239/ +43 512 507 6475 jos.debruijn@deri.org DERI http://www.deri.org/ - ---------------------------------------------- All generalizations are false, including this one. -- Mark Twain -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCcAM84lqeiwiiHN4RAvdRAJ9aOze+evuKa49+a4RQ9/OTvzXvTwCdHEKq duMMleCF9JBwQtaeJbxj778= =3kKi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2005 21:25:39 UTC