- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:31:14 -0400 (EDT)
- To: waldinger@ai.sri.com
- Cc: waldinger@kestrel.edu, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Oops, I meant to say owl:Nothing rdf:type _:a . _:a owl:onProperty rdfs:subClassOf . _:a owl:maxCardinality "2"^^xsd:integer . This, in effect, asserts that there are only two classes, as owl:Nothing is a subclass of every class. peter From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> Subject: Re: Axiomatic Semantics of OWL Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:01:41 -0400 (EDT) > > If you are interested in seeing how SNARK does on hard problems, try > it on the translation of > > owl:Nothing rdfs:subClassOf _:a . > _:a owl:onproperty rdfs:subClassOf . > _:a owl:maxCardinality "2"^^xsd:integer . > > This forms a contradiction in OWL Full. > > For harder problems, try increasing the maxCardinality. > > > peter
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 15:24:24 UTC