- From: Jim Farrugia <jim@spatial.maine.edu>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:06:06 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Does what is called the 'computational completeness' of OWL DL [1] give us the following property? Given a query Q expressible in the language of an OWL DL ontology O, an OWL DL reasoner will terminate in a finite amount of time, indicating whether Q is true in all models of O. What I'm trying to get at is a distinction between two different notions of completeness, which Hintikka in [2] calls 'semantical completeness' and 'deductive completeness' [pp. 91, 92]. "[Semantical completeness] is a property of a so-called axiomatization of (some part of) logic. It means that all the valid sentences of the underlying language can be obtained as theorems from the so-called axioms of that system of logic by means of its inference rules" [p. 91] "Deductive completeness is a property of a nonlogical axiom system T together with an axiomatization of logic (method of formal logical proof). It means that from T one can prove by means of the underlying logic C or not C for each sentence C of the language in question." [pp. 91,92] Thanks, Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ "computational completeness (all conclusions are guaranteed to be computable)" (Section 1.3) [2] The Principles of Mathematics Revisited. Cambridge, 1996. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 25 July 2004 14:13:21 UTC