- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:48:39 +0000
- To: "Peter Crowther" <Peter.Crowther@melandra.com>
- Cc: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, "Mikhail Khlopotov" <mik@chel.com.ru>, "www-rdf-logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
You can't represent "Transitive over" in OWL or RDF - it requires property inclusion (subProperty) axioms w.r.t. complex roles, in particular role compositions. In general, this leads to undecidability, but in a restricted form provides most of what is required and is still decidable. You will find the details in [1] (a paper published at IJCAI-03). Sorry for late response to thread and for self publicising :-) Ian [1] http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~horrocks/Publications/download/2003/HoSa03a.pdf On January 4, Peter Crowther writes: > > > From: Mikhail Khlopotov > > I found no direct way to express "transitive over" > > properties, I mean properties, which are not transitive by > > themselves, but are transitive over another property. > > I seem to recall a proof that such relations plus inverses, possibly > plus cardinality, is undecidable --- I'm out of that area at the moment, > so would have to check the literature for precise details. I suspect a > number of the other people on the list could provide a reference from > memory. It was for this reason of undecidability that the feature was > not included in OWL-DL. > > Some other KR formalisms have them, notably GRAIL > (http://www.opengalen.org/ is probably a good place to start for GRAIL). > An alternative approach to part-whole relations that may fit with OWL-DL > uses SEP triples. This uses three classes rather than one, to denote > (i) the thing as a whole, (ii) the thing and its parts, and (iii) the > parts. Apparently it is then possible to represent part-whole > relationships, moderately sensibly, without needing transitive-over > relationships. I know Professor Alan Rector at University of Manchester > has been working on using this approach with OWL; I don't know how far > he's got, as it's over a year since I last spoke to him about this. > > Sorry not to have more information to hand; I hope what little I can > provide is of some use! > > - Peter > -- > Peter Crowther, Director, Melandra Limited >
Received on Saturday, 10 January 2004 12:52:10 UTC