- From: Luis Bermudez <leb27@drexel.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:42:39 -0500
- To: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Dear Peter: Thanks for your fast response. I showed a small example of a my real problem, that is extending an ontology, which I cannot change (e.g. resources form datatype to object property), by restricting datatype property to only have values of a certain class (e.g. Resource B). So when doing : <owl:Class rdf:ID="A"> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:allValuesFrom> <rdf:List> <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">b1</rdf:first> <rdf:rest> <rdf:List rdf:rest="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"> <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">b2</rdf:first> </rdf:List> </rdf:rest> </rdf:List> </owl:allValuesFrom> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource ="#hasB"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> </owl:Class> There is no longer any reference that b1 and b2 are individuals of B Then you could say that they could be typed as nm:b1...., This does not work for me because is a big list of individuals, and they could constantly change. So I think I cannot use OWL-DL. Thanks again. Luis Bermudez -----Original Message----- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:01 AM To: leb27@drexel.edu Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org Subject: Re: Datatype restricted- allValuesFrom From: Luis Bermudez <leb27@drexel.edu> Subject: Datatype restricted- allValuesFrom Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:37:47 -0500 > Hi All: > > I have the following questions: > > 1. ) Could a datatype Property be restricted with an "allValuesFrom" > restriction ? A quick examination of the non-RDF (abstract) syntax for OWL DL will produce the knowledge that this is allowed in both OWL DL and OWL Lite. (Look in Section 2.3.1.2 of OWL S&AS at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics.) > (I think is possible, but it will be OWL-Full) e.g. : > > <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:ID="hasB"> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#A"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"/ > <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> > > </owl:DatatypeProperty> > > <owl:Class rdf:ID="A"> > <rdfs:subClassOf> > <owl:Restriction> > <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource ="#B"/> > <owl:onProperty rdf:resource ="#hasB"/> > </owl:Restriction> > </rdfs:subClassOf> > </owl:Class> > > <owl:Class rdf:ID="B"/> > <B rdf:ID="b1"/> > <B rdf:ID="b2"/> However, the above is OWL Full, as in OWL DL the restrictions on datatype properties must be datatype classes, rdfs:Literal, or oneOf's on literals. > 2.) If it is possible how should an individual look like? > > > <A rdf:ID="individual_a"> > <hasB rdf:resource="#b1"/> > </A> > > or > > <A rdf:ID="individual_a"> > <hasB>ns:b1<hasB> > </A> These two have the same meaning to RDF, and thus to OWL. > 3.) If I want to extend a datatype property so that it should be > restricted to a set of individuals is the previous the best way to > go, or is there any work around to have it in OWL-DL ? Datatype properties in OWL DL have things like integers as their value. I think that what you really want here is not a datatype property, but instead an objectproperty, as in the following: <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="hasB"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#A"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"/> </owl:ObjectProperty> <owl:Class rdf:ID="A"> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource ="#B"/> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource ="#hasB"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> </owl:Class> <owl:Class rdf:ID="B"/> <B rdf:ID="b1"/> <B rdf:ID="b2"/> If you indeed want a datatype property you could go about it this way in OWL DL. <owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:ID="hasB"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#A"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string"/> </owl:DatatypeProperty> <owl:Class rdf:ID="A"> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:allValuesFrom> <rdf:List> <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">b1</rdf:first> <rdf:rest> <rdf:List rdf:rest="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"> <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">b1</rdf:first> </rdf:List> </rdf:rest> </rdf:List> </owl:allValuesFrom> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource ="#hasB"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> </owl:Class> > Thank you very much, > > Luis Bermudez > leb27@drexel.edu Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 09:43:00 UTC