Syntax Question

• From: Stephen Rhoads <rhoadsnyc@mac.com>
• Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:30:32 -0500
• To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
• Message-ID: <16481316.1102023032513.JavaMail.rhoadsnyc@mac.com>

Folks,

If Qualified Cardinality Constraints were part of OWL, what would they look like in the Abstract Syntax?  Something like this, maybe?

class(Human partial
   restriction(hasParent cardinality(2) Human))

(Don't ask).

--- Stephen

Received on Thursday, 2 December 2004 21:30:36 UTC