- From: Yarden Katz <yarden@umd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:20:37 -0500
- To: "Stephane Fellah" <fellah@pcigeomatics.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, "Weisheng Li" <weisheng@pcigeomatics.com>, "Steven Keens" <skeens@pcigeomatics.com>
"Stephane Fellah" <fellah@pcigeomatics.com> writes: [snip] > - Queries/antecedants of Horn rules are represented as a RDF document ( > so no need for specific parser ) [snip] Maybe I'm misunderstanding your ideas, but given the above there would be a need for a "specific parser" (not in the syntactic but in the semantic sense) for your RDF document, since you would work off the assumption that triples in queries are un-asserted. This, like Drew McDermott noted, would inherently be non-RDF. So I think what you described would work, it just wouldn't be RDF; it is merely RDF syntax with altered semantics. Am I missing the point? Looking forward to hearing from you, -- Yarden Katz <yarden@umd.edu> | Mind the gap
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:56:23 UTC