- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 13:59:06 -0400
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>, "www-rdf-logic at W3C" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
This may validate but it does not mean what I think you intend it to, for example: 1) the object of an property given as the value of an _attribute_ is always a literal string... in most cases I believe you intend these to be URIrefs which should be indicated as ... <foo:prop rdf:resource="#foo" /> rather than <foo:bar foo:prop="foo" /> 2) OWL has no concept of "mkr:similarTo" so although you can write this down in OWL, OWL conformant software wouldn't have a clue as wether this is at all 'similar' to "owl:sameAs" -- so I presume you are suggesting that MKR is some type of extension to OWL Full? Which is fine ... I presume you have software that can suck in some OWL ontologies as well as MKR statements and do something interesting? Jonathan ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard H. McCullough To: Richard H. McCullough ; www-rdf-logic at W3C Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 7:30 PM Subject: Re: basicmkr.owl After several iterations, this version http://rhm.cdepot.net/knowledge/theory/OWL/basicmkr.owl passed the RDF Validator. Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list;
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2003 13:59:51 UTC