Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ?

At 13:04 20/03/2002 +0000, Ian Horrocks wrote:
[...]

> > This is the first I have heard of this proposal to redefine the model for
> > RDF and RDFS, so its not surprising there has been no 'official response',
> > at least from RDFCore.
>
>Fair enough - it was never really a proposal, just a paper published as SWWS.

I'll look forward to reading it :)

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 14:14:08 UTC