- From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 15:41:33 -0400
- To: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> To: "Geoff Chappell" <geoff@sover.net>; <www-rdf-logic@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: Re: Datatypes input: summary of responses so far > > Hi Geoff, > > Phew, you guys do make work for me :) How do I interpret this response? > > It says, prefer tidy, if the rdf/xml parser were to transform all literals > into a b-node structure on input. > > We have considered that option, and basically rejected it on the grounds it > would change the interpretation of pretty much all existing rdf/xml. BTW, I personally don't think this would be more significant that "changing" all literals to untidy. -geoff
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 11:41:21 UTC