- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:55:08 -0400
- To: "Giles Hogben" <giles.hogben@jrc.it>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
> > OK - so can you explain this para? > > The idea of "unasserted triples" allows a "higher level" language to define > the truth value for such triples according to its own rules (i.e. model > theory). > Certainly, this is an _idea_. I did not say this was part of RDF as it is currently formulated. On the other hand, the current round of RDF working drafts are just that -- working drafts. They are not yet final recommendations. For extensive discussion of this topic see http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg and/or http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg archives. For a summary as of May, see: http://www.openhealth.org/WOWG/DTTF but the RDFCore archives contain lots of discussion subsequent to this. Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 11:00:46 UTC