- From: Steven Gollery <sgollery@cadrc.calpoly.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:51:46 -0800
- To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Seth, Due to my lack of background in this area, I've always had a hard time understanding your mentographs. Can you point me to some sort of introductory material? Also, I wonder if it is possible to express your mentograph in DAML. Not only would it help me to understand the graph a little better, but it would go a long way to answering Huajun's original question. Thanks in advance, Steven Gollery sgollery@cadrc.calpoly.edu Seth Russell wrote: > From: "Huajun Zeng (Intl Staffing)" <i-hjzeng@microsoft.com> > > > I am entangled when I try to use DAML to describe such a sentence: > > "Tom likes fish". The following statement seems to work, > > > > <p:person rdf:ID="Tom"> > > <p:like rdf:resource="f:fish" /> > > </p:person> > > > > but I found it only represents "Tom likes an intance of fish", not the > > class of fishes. Futhermore, if another people, Jack, also likes fish > > and is described as above, we cannot say Tom and Jack are similar. > > Because they like their own fishes individually! > > > > It seems that if the class "fish" is also an instance, the problem is > > resolved. But as I know, the occuring of type and subClassOf in > > a same statement has no semantics. > > Your term 'like' has no semantics either. I think you need to use a schema > where you can do quantification. See for example: > http://robustai.net/mentography/quantificationFish.gif > > Seth Russell
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2002 12:49:45 UTC