- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 08:08:53 -0800
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: "RDF Logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
From: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> > >>> For example: > >>> > >>> foo:bar goo:dar poo:sar. > >>> > >>> [ > >>> rdf:type rdf:Statement; > >>> rdf:subject foo:bar; > >>> rdf:predicate goo:gar; > >>> rdf:object: poo:sar; > >>> ex:time "9:15PM" > >>> email::mid 0$657ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com ; > >>> ex:documentLocation :SethsOutbox > >>> ] > >>> > >>> The description above describes the triple as it existed momentarily in > > my > >>> out box. It does not describe the copy of that same triple as it exists > > in > >>> your inbox. > >> > >> Uhhh... now I'm confused as to which "thing" we are talking about. > >> I thought the "thing" was the bNode with rdf:type rdf:Statement. > >> You seem to now be equating "thing" with the triple. Or have I > >> just gotten gonzo confused ;-) > >> > >> If the "thing" is the reification, and if the reification is copied, > >> then of course the copy describes the original statement as accurately > >> and completely as the original reification. Why wouldn't it? > > > > I agree. Since there is both a triple in the document as well as a > > description of that triple in the same document, when the document is > > copied, the description of the triple still refers to the original triple. > > But it does not refer to the triple in the document in your email in box. > > This is a very carefully contrived case :) > > Hmmm... I'm gonna sleep on that one and let my subconscious > take a wack at it ;-) There is nothing very philosophically subtle here, the trick is in the description "ex:documentLocation :SethsOutbox". You, of all people, could probably help me with the exact URI that would be correct for ":SethsOutbox" and how the rdfs:range should be specified to make the example actually work. Also when I was composing the email I didn know the exact Message-ID or time that it would appear in my out box ... please to correct the example above with the following data which is now known: Message-Id 014501c1ae04$00234c20$657ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com date 4 Feb 2002 21:14:34 -0800 Seth Russell
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 11:12:17 UTC