- From: R.V.Guha <guha@guha.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:19:56 -0700
- To: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Much of the debate around layering of OWL on top of RDF and RDFs boils down to whether the Semantic Web should treat classes and arc labels as first class objects, about which arbitrary new kinds of statements can be made. This is an important architectural choice which has to take into account results from systems that have been built. Looking at what was learnt from such systems would probably be productive ... RDF, which has been largely influenced by the experimental "scruffy" side of AI has gone the route of many experimental AI systems (starting from KRL, RLL, .... CycL) and incorporated these as first class objects. In my experience, and the experience of the builders of these systems, this has been a useful feature. Description Logics, which come from the more "neat" side of AI chose not to allow this ... Clearly, not allowing this feature buys description logics something. Ian, maybe you could explain exactly what this is and how it has been found useful in large DL systems that have been built? thanks, guha
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 17:21:31 UTC