- From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:16:35 -0400
- To: Dave Rager <drager@bbn.com>
- cc: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>, Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
I've been avoiding the use of daml:imports and not encouraging others to use it, because the current DAML+OIL specification makes no distinction between statements that are imported and those that are not and daml:imports thus seems to add gratuitous complexity. I'm also concerned about the granularity of daml:imports. This was discussed by WebOnt without resolution, but I can't find it on the current issues list [1]. Mike [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html
Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 22:18:40 UTC