www-rdf-logic@w3.org from April 2002 by date

Tuesday, 30 April 2002

• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Jos De_Roo
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Seth Russell
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:imports right is easy?) Drew McDermott
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter Crowther
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Sandro Hawke
• Semantic commitment (was RE: rdf inclusion) Didier VILLEVALOIS
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Sandro Hawke

Monday, 29 April 2002

• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Sandro Hawke
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Sandro Hawke
• Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:imports right is easy?) Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf inclusion Pat Hayes
• Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:imports right is easy?) Pat Hayes
• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Pat Hayes
• Re: rdf inclusion Pat Hayes

Friday, 26 April 2002

• Re: rdf inclusion Sandro Hawke
• Re: rdf inclusion Drew McDermott
• Re: rdf inclusion Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• Re: rdf inclusion Jeff Heflin
• Re: rdf inclusion Drew McDermott
• Re: rdf inclusion Dan Brickley
• Re: rdf inclusion Jeff Heflin
• Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? Pat Hayes
• Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? Drew McDermott
• Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? Drew McDermott
• Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? Drew McDermott
• Re: getting daml:imports right is easy? Drew McDermott
• getting daml:imports right is easy? Drew McDermott

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• Re: rdf inclusion Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 23 April 2002

• Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05 Drew McDermott
• Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05 Jeff Heflin
• Re: rdf inclusion Jeff Heflin
• Re: rdf inclusion Jeff Heflin
• RE: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05 Didier VILLEVALOIS
• RE: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05 Dan Brickley
• Re: rdf inclusion Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf inclusion Mike Dean
• Re: rdf inclusion Drew McDermott

Monday, 22 April 2002

• Re: rdf inclusion Dave Rager
• Re: rdf inclusion tim finin
• RE: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05 Didier VILLEVALOIS
• Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05 Jeff Heflin
• Re: rdf inclusions (was Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05) Frank Manola
• Re: rdf inclusions (was Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05) Drew McDermott
• Re: rdf inclusions (was Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05) Graham Klyne
• EU-NSF Semantic web strategic workshop report Jerome Euzenat
• Re: rdf inclusions (was Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05) Sandro Hawke

Sunday, 21 April 2002

• Re: rdf inclusions (was Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05) Drew McDermott
• Re: rdf inclusions (was Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05) Frank Manola
• rdf inclusions (was Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05) Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 9 April 2002

• CFP: CLIMA'02 - Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems João Alexandre Leite

Sunday, 21 April 2002

• Re: DAML Level of Effort for FY03-FY05 Drew McDermott

Saturday, 20 April 2002

• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Jos De_Roo

Friday, 19 April 2002

• Open PhD Position - Project SWWS "Semantic Web Enabled Web Services" Alexander Maedche

Thursday, 18 April 2002

• Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Sandro Hawke
• RE: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Miles Sabin
• A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web Sandro Hawke
• Re: inference rule markup in W3C specs? Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 17 April 2002

• Re: Some DAML clarification Steven Gollery
• PhD and Post-Doc Positions at AIFB, Karlsruhe Gerd Stumme
• Re: Some DAML clarification Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ? Pat Hayes

Friday, 12 April 2002

• ISWC2002: call for participation (registration open) Jerome Euzenat

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• CFP (extended deadline): Ontologies in Agent Systems at AAMAS'02 Stephen Cranefield

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Re: inference rule markup in W3C specs? Harold Boley
• Re: inference rule markup in W3C specs? Dan Connolly
• DAML+OIL Ontology Editor Ian Horrocks
• Re: inference rule markup in W3C specs? Andrea Asperti

Thursday, 11 April 2002

• inference rule markup in W3C specs? Dan Connolly

Monday, 8 April 2002

• Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ? Steven Gollery

Sunday, 7 April 2002

• Re: Some DAML clarification Steven Gollery
• Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ? Ian Horrocks

Saturday, 6 April 2002

• Re: Some DAML clarification Graham Klyne
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Graham Klyne

Friday, 5 April 2002

• Re: Some DAML clarification Drew McDermott
• Variables in rules Drew McDermott
• RE: Some DAML clarification Charlie Abela
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Richard Waldinger
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Sandro Hawke
• Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ? Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Sandro Hawke
• Re: Mapping of DAML+OIL onto DB Jim Hendler
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Dave Reynolds
• Re: Mapping of DAML+OIL onto DB Hector Ceballos
• Re: Mapping of DAML+OIL onto DB Soetens Peter
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Pat Hayes

Thursday, 4 April 2002

• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Sandro Hawke
• Re: Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Graham Klyne
• Existentially Quantified Variables (bNodes) in RDF-like-languages Sandro Hawke
• Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ? Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 3 April 2002

• Re: Mapping of DAML+OIL onto DB Enrico Franconi
• RE: Some DAML clarification Charlie Abela
• Re: Mapping of DAML+OIL onto DB Hector Ceballos
• Re: Some DAML clarification Drew McDermott

Tuesday, 2 April 2002

• Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies... Eric Miller
• Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies... John F. Sowa

Monday, 1 April 2002

• Re: Just say not Jim Hendler
• Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Bill Andersen
• Fwd: Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Jim Hendler
• Re: Just say not Pat Hayes
• Re: rdfs:Class vs. daml:Class ? Pat Hayes

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 18:53:45 UTC