- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 17:53:40 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: > > I am concerned that this model theory locks RDF into a particular > way of interpreting literals, namely that the interpretation of a literal > can be completely determined from its label, using a fixed mapping to > literal values. I believe this is by design. It's an important requirement on RDF syntax that it be "context free"... i.e. that this level of meaning is syntactically evident. Hmm... I thought this requirement was pretty well documented, but I don't see it in http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2001 18:53:43 UTC