<p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal> (Really quick question)

Perhaps I should rephrase the question... Can an anonymous node be used
where a literal is required? In other words, is it possible the have an
anonymous literal.

-AM

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Michal" <amichal@intellidimension.com>
To: <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:36 PM
Subject: <p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal>


> Perhaps this is something that has already been discussed but I want to
> check an assumption. Under RDF Model Theory [1], are the following triples
> legal RDFS?
>
> <_s> <p> <_o>
> <p> <rdfs:range> <rdfs:Literal>
>
> What about under http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ or the
> previous version?
>
> -AM
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 18 October 2001 12:44:27 UTC