- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:49:00 +0300
- To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Pat Hayes [mailto:phayes@ai.uwf.edu] > Sent: 04 October, 2001 00:36 > To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere) > Cc: www-rdf-logic@w3.org > Subject: RE: Literals (Re: model theory for RDF/S) > > > ..... > > > >Thus, the problem of "05" =? "5" =? "5.0" etc. can be addressed > >from several directions, and the final solution can be based > >on several cooperating mechanisms: URI schemes, RDFS, DAML, > >localhost services, etc. > > That sounds nice, but its actually very complicated. The trouble with > this perspective is that while it allows each mechanism to make its > own contribution, as it were, it also obliges all the mechanisms to > be alert for, and to be able to handle appropriately, any > contributions any of the others might make. It forces them to be in a > committee which has to meet every time any one of them has anything > to say about what might be equal to what. > > It would be better, in practice, if this issue could be organized > into distinct parts and these then farmed out to distinct mechanisms > or layers to deal with alone. That would be more work for us human > committee members, but it would be a lot easier on the software > agents that have to use the resulting standards. > > Pat Hayes Your point is well taken. And in fact I made the comment that I expect that a "good" solution to this issue will take some work. And I share your preferance for a solution which simplifies use at the expense of (a reasonable amount of) more work up front. Cheers, Patrick
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2001 03:49:05 UTC