Re: Extending daml+oil with concrete datatypes

At 03:57 PM 1/23/2001 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>We don't have to give semantics to the green-brown example, it just
>falls out from the semantic definitions.  Also, it is hard to forbid the
>double-property restrictions, again because of problems with RDF.
>
>peter


Wouldn't a cardinality constraint for the restriction definition
in the DAML specification do the job of forbidding double-property 
restrictions?

Best,
         Stefan

Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2001 16:28:41 UTC