- From: Dickinson, Ian J <Ian_J_Dickinson@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:13:28 -0000
- To: "'Ian Horrocks'" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'www-rdf-logic@w3.org'" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Ian, From: Ian Horrocks [mailto:horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk] > I would suggest that a better way to do it would be: > <daml:Disjoint> > <daml:first rdf:resource="#Car"/> > <daml:rest rdf:parseType="daml:collection"> > <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#Person"/> > <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#Plant"/> > </daml:rest> > </daml:Disjoint> Thanks for your comments. I take your point about the Disjoint list itself not having a meaning, and hence not being equivalentTo another class. Hmm. We now have three suggestions: one from Dan C, one from Peter P-S, and one from Ian H. There may be others too. What's the process for coming to a consensus on this? Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________________________________ Ian J. Dickinson HP Labs, Bristol, UK mailto:Ian_Dickinson@hp.com
Received on Friday, 12 January 2001 13:13:39 UTC