Ian, From: Ian Horrocks [mailto:horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk] > I would suggest that a better way to do it would be: > <daml:Disjoint> > <daml:first rdf:resource="#Car"/> > <daml:rest rdf:parseType="daml:collection"> > <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#Person"/> > <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#Plant"/> > </daml:rest> > </daml:Disjoint> Thanks for your comments. I take your point about the Disjoint list itself not having a meaning, and hence not being equivalentTo another class. Hmm. We now have three suggestions: one from Dan C, one from Peter P-S, and one from Ian H. There may be others too. What's the process for coming to a consensus on this? Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________________________________ Ian J. Dickinson HP Labs, Bristol, UK mailto:Ian_Dickinson@hp.comReceived on Friday, 12 January 2001 13:13:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:45:36 UTC