RE: Bugs in 2000/12 daml+oil reference on DAML collections

Ian,

From: Ian Horrocks [mailto:horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk]
> I would suggest that a better way to do it would be:

> <daml:Disjoint>
>   <daml:first rdf:resource="#Car"/>
>   <daml:rest rdf:parseType="daml:collection">
>     <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#Person"/>
>     <rdfs:Class rdf:about="#Plant"/>
>   </daml:rest>
> </daml:Disjoint>

Thanks for your comments. I take your point about the Disjoint list itself
not having a meaning, and hence not being equivalentTo another class. 

Hmm. We now have three suggestions: one from Dan C, one from Peter P-S, and
one from Ian H.  There may be others too. What's the process for coming to a
consensus on this?

Cheers,
Ian

_______________________________________________________________________
Ian J. Dickinson    HP Labs, Bristol, UK    mailto:Ian_Dickinson@hp.com