- From: Arjohn Kampman <akam@aidministrator.nl>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:33:33 +0200 (MEST)
- To: conen@gmx.de, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
> Which interpretation of range constraints do you prefer? > > [ P, rdfs:range, C] > is intended to express: > (a) P may be applied to any resource that belongs to class C > or > (b) If P is applied to a resource r, r will belong to C I'd prefer (a), because using (b) can lead you into strange situations: Assume that the C is rdfs:Literal and that you're using a resource uri as a target of the property. Using (b) this would mean that the uri is a literal. To the best of my knowledge, a uri cannot be both a resource and a literal. Arjohn -- arjohn.kampman@aidministrator.nl aidministrator nederland b.v. - http://www.aidministrator.nl/ prinses julianaplein 14-b, 3817 cs amersfoort, the netherlands tel. +31-(0)33-4659987 fax. +31-(0)33-4659987
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 04:35:04 UTC