- From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 07:54:36 +0600
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, "Richard Fikes" <fikes@KSL.Stanford.EDU>, "www-rdf-logic" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Name equivalence would surely be "Fred" = "Fred", surely this is about the resources being equivalent "Fred Jones" = "Fred S. Jones" --- Danny Ayers http://www.isacat.net <- -----Original Message----- <- From: www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org <- [mailto:www-rdf-logic-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Seth Russell <- Sent: 19 April 2001 06:59 <- To: Richard Fikes; www-rdf-logic <- Subject: Re: "equivalentTo" in DAML+OIL <- <- <- From: "Richard Fikes" <fikes@KSL.Stanford.EDU> <- <- > It seems that "equivalentTo" enables one to assert that any two <- > resources are equal, meaning that they denote the same object in the <- > domain of discourse. I presume that means "equivalentTo" can <- be used to <- > assert that any two URIs are equal. <- <- Hmmm .. I take "equivalentTo" to assert that any two URIs denote the same <- thing. Not as you put it "equivalentTo enables one to assert <- that any two <- resources are equal". In other words I take it that <- "equivalentTo" states <- a relationship between names, not between the resources they denote. <- <- Have I taken it correctly? <- <- Seth <- <-
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2001 21:58:27 UTC