Re: Semantic mail

Hello all,

In his message (Re: Semantic mail) of 8/11/00,
Jim Hendler wrote:
>  I would not do much to metadata tag my mail (or much else), but as 
>those of you who know the DAML program I'm running know - I think we 
>can make tagging very easy in many cases.  Example - a little menu 
>in my mailer that let me choose an ontology and some properties -- 
>put it on my mail (and gaurantee those would propagate unless 
>someone explicitely removed) woudl be great -- then this "semantic 
>mail" thread, for example, could be something I could track and 
>trace (see Pat, it's not all push) or filter when I get bored.
>  I think easy to use taggers, tied to machine readable technologies, 
>will be a really important technology -- DAML folks out there, 
>that's one for someone looking for what to do...

May I suggest a look at:
@Article{Schwartz:99,
   author =       "D. Schwartz",
   title =        "When Email meets organizational memories",
   journal =      "International journal of human-computer studies",
   year =         1999,
   volume =       51,
   number =       3,
   pages =        "599-614"
}

A very simple and practical tool that could be used with ontologies.
-- 
  Jérôme Euzenat                  __
                                  /      /\
  INRIA Rhône-Alpes,            _/  _   _   _ _    _
                               /_) | ` / ) | \ \  /_)
  655, avenue de l'Europe,    (___/___(_/_/  / /_(_________________
  Montbonnot St Martin,       /        http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
  38334 Saint-Ismier cedex,  /          Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
  France____________________/                Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr

Received on Friday, 10 November 2000 03:21:23 UTC