www-rdf-logic@w3.org from November 2000 by date

Friday, 1 December 2000

• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Seth Russell

Thursday, 30 November 2000

• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Drew McDermott
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Graham Klyne
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Guha

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Graham Klyne

Thursday, 30 November 2000

• FREE SAMPLE Sam
• Re: unambiguousProperty Dan Connolly
• unambiguousProperty McBride, Brian

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• Model Theory on one page [was: I have a trouble with The RDF Model] Dan Connolly
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) pat hayes
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model pat hayes
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms pat hayes
• Re: An Axiomatic Semantics for RDF, RDF Schema, and DAML-ONT Richard Fikes

Tuesday, 28 November 2000

• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Graham Klyne
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Graham Klyne
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Graham Klyne
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 29 November 2000

• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) Dan Brickley
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) Dan Connolly
• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Seth Russell
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) Ora Lassila
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) Guha
• Re: A question about DAML lists Ian Horrocks
• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Seth Russell
• Re: An Axiomatic Semantics of RDF, RDF Schema, and DAML-ONT Richard Fikes
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model pat hayes
• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Sean B. Palmer
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) Ora Lassila
• Re: Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Seth Russell
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Converters for RDF(S), DAML-O, UML/XMI, Protege, reification, new XML serializer Sergey Melnik

Tuesday, 28 November 2000

• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• Logic and Using The Semantic Web Toolbox Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Ian Horrocks
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Jeff Heflin
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Jeff Heflin
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms pat hayes
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Ian Horrocks
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Ian Horrocks
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) Deborah McGuinness
• Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model) Gabe Beged-Dov
• errors in daml-ex Sergey Melnik

Monday, 27 November 2000

• Closedness strikes back! [Was: Equality and subclass axioms] Je'ro^me Euzenat
• Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model) Seth Russell
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Seth Russell
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms pat hayes
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Jeff Heflin
• Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model) ssarkar@ayushnet.com
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model pat hayes
• Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model) Jonas Liljegren
• RE: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model) Jonathan Borden
• tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model) Gabe Beged-Dov
• Re: A question about DAML lists Dan Connolly

Sunday, 26 November 2000

• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Stefan Decker
• A question about DAML lists Ian Horrocks
• Fw: looking at description logics Jos De Roo
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Ian Horrocks
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model pat hayes
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms pat hayes
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Gabe Beged-Dov
• Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model Stefan Decker
• Re: Equality and subclass axioms Jim Hendler
• I have a trouble with The RDF Model Seth Russell

Saturday, 25 November 2000

• Equality and subclass axioms Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposed revision to daml-ont Ian Horrocks

Thursday, 23 November 2000

• Re: Proposed revision to daml-ont Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed revision to daml-ont Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 22 November 2000

• Re: Joint EU/US ad hoc Agent Markup Language Committee Mike Dean
• Proposed revision to daml-ont Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 21 November 2000

• Joint EU/US ad hoc Agent Markup Language Committee Jim Hendler
• SHOE to DAML-ONT Mapping and Other Resources Jeff Heflin

Friday, 17 November 2000

• CfP - Semantic Web 2001 Workshop at WWW10 Steffen Staab
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT John F. Sowa
• inferences in the axiomatic semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Richard Fikes
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 16 November 2000

• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Richard Fikes
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Je'ro^me Euzenat
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Deborah McGuinness
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Richard Fikes
• Re: model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Dan Connolly
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Dan Connolly
• model-theoretic semantics for DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT pat hayes

Wednesday, 15 November 2000

• Re: comments on DAML-ONT semantics document Richard Fikes

Tuesday, 14 November 2000

• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Richard Fikes
• comments on DAML-ONT semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Deborah McGuinness
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Richard Fikes
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT (now, an Axiomatic Semantics) Deborah McGuinness
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo, subClassOf, subPropertyOf Dan Connolly
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Dan Connolly
• DAML-ONT TODO list Dan Connolly

Monday, 13 November 2000

• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Jeff Heflin

Sunday, 12 November 2000

• Re: Semantic mail Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 11 November 2000

• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 10 November 2000

• RE: Semantic mail Emery, Pat
• RE: Semantic mail Raphael Malyankar
• Announcing Rule Markup Initiative Harold Boley
• SV: Semantic mail Greg FitzPatrick
• Semantic mail Greg FitzPatrick
• RE: Semantic mail Craig Pugsley
• RE: Semantic mail Craig Pugsley
• RE: Semantic mail Jim Hendler
• RE: Semantic mail pat hayes
• RE: Semantic mail Craig Pugsley
• Re: Semantic mail pat hayes
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Je'ro^me Euzenat
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT pat hayes

Thursday, 9 November 2000

• Re: Semantic mail Je'ro^me Euzenat
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Deborah McGuinness
• Semantic mail - weekend edition Greg FitzPatrick
• RE: Semantic mail Nicolas Chauvat
• Re: A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Dan Connolly
• A Model Theoretic Semantics for DAML-ONT Deborah McGuinness
• RE: Semantic mail Terry R. Payne
• Re: Semantic mail Dan Connolly
• Re: Semantic mail Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 8 November 2000

• Re: Semantic mail Aaron Swartz
• Semantic mail Greg FizPatrick
• Re: Semantic mail pat hayes
• Business Opportunity snibbelin@msn.com

Tuesday, 7 November 2000

• Ontologies for the Semantic Web York Sure
• SV: Semantic mail Greg FitzPatrick
• A proposal for an RDF query language Greg Karvounarakis
• Re: Semantic mail William Loughborough
• Semantic mail Greg FitzPatrick

Monday, 6 November 2000

• DAML Ontology Repository Jim Hendler
• IEEE IS special issue on semantic web technology Dieter Fensel

Sunday, 5 November 2000

• Re: restrictions in DAML-O Guha

Saturday, 4 November 2000

• Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?) Seth Russell
• Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?) Graham Klyne

Friday, 3 November 2000

• Re: TODO++: daml-ont TallThing Ian Horrocks
• RE: TODO++: daml-ont TallThing Ian Horrocks
• Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?) Seth Russell
• RE: TODO++: daml-ont TallThing Hart, Lewis
• Re: TODO++: daml-ont TallThing David Martin
• Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?) Graham Klyne
• RE: TODO++: daml-ont TallThing Ian Horrocks
• Re: restrictions in DAML-O Dan Connolly
• Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?) Sergey Melnik
• restrictions in DAML-O Sergey Melnik

Thursday, 2 November 2000

• Your Online Trading Account bluechip@mindspring.com
• RE: Upper Cyc Ontology as MS Access DB Atanas Kiryakov
• Re: Bound variables Drew McDermott
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies RA Poell

Wednesday, 1 November 2000

• RE: What is an Ontology? [was: daml-ont] McBride, Brian
• Re: Bound variables pat hayes
• RE: TODO++: daml-ont TallThing pat hayes
• RE: What is an Ontology? [was: daml-ont] McBride, Brian
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies Graham Klyne
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies Graham Klyne
• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Graham Klyne
• RE: TODO++: daml-ont TallThing McBride, Brian
• TODO++: daml-ont TallThing Dan Connolly
• What is an Ontology? [was: daml-ont] Dan Connolly
• Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax pat hayes
• daml-ont McBride, Brian
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies Dave Reynolds
• RE: names, URIs and ontologies McBride, Brian

Last message date: Thursday, 30 November 2000 21:06:40 UTC