- From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 18:08:46 +0100
- To: guha@guha.com
- CC: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, www-rdf-logic@w3.org
Guha wrote: > I have a simple (albeit potentially controversial) answer --- it is the > range of the interpretation of RDF expressions. Controversial, indeed ! I'm not sure I dislike it, although :) But strictly speaking, if it is true, then RDF describes Nodes and Arcs, not Resources... So, as I previously posed it, I think the grapoh is the *interpretation* of the XML *syntax*, but it is also a "higher level" *syntax*, whose interpretation is in the world of resources (or entities, or both, I'm not sure)... Pierre-Antoine -- Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. (Bill Watterson -- Calvin & Hobbes)
Received on Friday, 1 December 2000 12:09:47 UTC