On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:36:15PM +0200, Jan Algermissen wrote: > On Jul 8, 2005, at 5:56 PM, Miles, AJ ((Alistair)) wrote: > >I'd be happy to rename it to 'change management'. > > Beware that change management is primarily interested in the > management of the change *process* (requesting a change, controlling > undesired effects of the intended change, getting approval etc.) not > the versioning issues. This puts a finger on why I'm not comfortable with the word "management". > Configuration management OTH, *is* concerned with managing the > versions (or at least baselines) if applied to source code (the > configuration of a piece of source code is its content). However, analogies involving software code or automobile options seem misleading. How about "change documentation" or even (to come full circle) "version documentation"? Tom -- Dr. Thomas Baker baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de SUB - Goettingen State +49-551-39-3883 and University Library +49-30-8109-9027 Papendiek 14, 37073 GöttingenReceived on Saturday, 9 July 2005 09:33:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:56 UTC