RE: Language X within scope of language Y from Peter Constable on 2005-01-19 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from January 2005)

From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:30:48 -0800
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-international@w3.org>
Cc: <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Message-ID: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE04CD9957@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

> From: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-

> bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Jon Hanna

 

 

> There are two issues here. One is linguistic and almost philosopical, viz.

> is "Tao Te Ching" when used in English, English or Chinese?

 

I'm not familiar with that work, but certainly "Das Kapital" is German even if I refer to it in an English conversation; "Capital" would be English. (/dæs kʰæpɪɾɫ̩/ would be German spoken with an American English accent.)

 

 

Peter Constable

Received on Thursday, 20 January 2005 04:41:24 UTC