- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:19:35 +0100
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Ops, I was looking at an old version of rdf-concepts, in the current version (1) there is no rdf-wrapper and the answer to my question seems to be in section 3.4 "[XHTML] <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#ref-xhtml> may be included within RDF in this way. Sometimes, in this latter case, an additional |span| or |div| element is needed to carry an |xml:lang| or |lang| attribute.". Actually I'm not sure if I'm convinced to look into the xhtml and possibly change it, or if I'll go on with plain literals. reto 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/ Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: > In my application I often deal with XHTML in literal values. The > literal have a language as a whole, usually this is the language of > all the xhtml elements but not necessarily. Currently I'm storing > these as plain literals, now I read in rdf-concepts that XMLLiterals > have a root element "rdf-wrapper" which may have an xml:lang. Do I > understand this right that all xml-literals have this (implicit) > wrapper and may have a language? How do I encode an XMLLiteral with > language in rdf/xml? > > The RDF-Validator does not mention the language in the triple-list > generated from the following: > > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/"> > <dc:title rdf:parseType="Literal" xml:lang="en">World Wide Web > Consortium</dc:title> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> > > Thanks! > reto >
Received on Monday, 17 January 2005 22:12:10 UTC