Monday, 31 January 2005
- Re: .rdf file extension security?
- ANNOUNCE: Rx4RDF and Rhizome 0.4.3
- .rdf file extension security?
- CfP: ESWC2005 Workshop on Ontologies in P2P Communities
- Rules for converting from FOL->DL(OWL)?
Sunday, 30 January 2005
Saturday, 29 January 2005
Friday, 28 January 2005
- RE: VIP-Booking.com Newsletter Volume 64 - 28/01/2005
- VIP-Booking.com Newsletter Volume 64 - 28/01/2005
- CFP: DOA 2005
Thursday, 27 January 2005
Wednesday, 26 January 2005
Tuesday, 25 January 2005
- Call For Papers: 30 Joint Conferences in CS & CE; June 2005, Las Vegas, USA
- ICEIS'2005-International Workshop on Ubiquitous Computing Deadline extended
- Re: Reasoning
- Re: Reasoning
- Re: Reasoning
- Re: Reasoning
- job posting: DFKI at Kaiserslautern offers job as Software-Engineer
- job posting: DFKI at Kaiserslautern offers job as Researcher
- Reasoning
- Reasoning
Sunday, 23 January 2005
Monday, 24 January 2005
- RSS 1.1: Second Public Draft
- Reminder - Call for papers: 10th International Workshop on Web Caching and Content Distribution (WCW 2005)
- Re: python rdf tools?
Sunday, 23 January 2005
Sunday, 5 November 2000
Saturday, 4 November 2000
Saturday, 22 January 2005
- Re: David Garc(wrong
- Re: RSS 1.1 usage of parseType="Collection"
- RSS 1.0v1.4 (was Re: RSS 1.1)
- updated WSS2005 CfP
- Sign up for VIP News and help the children in Asia!
Friday, 21 January 2005
- Re: python rdf tools?
- Re: python rdf tools?
- Re: python rdf tools?
- Re: RSS 1.1 usage of parseType="Collection"
- Re: python rdf tools?
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
Thursday, 20 January 2005
Wednesday, 19 January 2005
- RE: Language X within scope of language Y
- RE: Language X within scope of language Y
- RE: Language X within scope of language Y
Thursday, 20 January 2005
- Re: Language X within scope of language Y
- Re: Language X within scope of language Y
- Re: Language X within scope of language Y
Wednesday, 19 January 2005
- RE: POSTing RDF via HTML forms?
- POSTing RDF via HTML forms?
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: Language X within scope of language Y
- RE: Language X within scope of language Y
- Re: RSS 1.1 usage of parseType="Collection"
- Re: Language X within scope of language Y
- Re: Language X within scope of language Y
- How many "person" concepts in the Semantic Web? (Best Practices)
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Language X within scope of language Y
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: Striping and Capitalization in RSS 1.1 [was: Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1]
- Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- Re: RSS 1.1 usage of parseType="Collection"
- Striping and Capitalization in RSS 1.1 [was: Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1]
- RSS 1.1 usage of parseType="Collection"
- Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- RE: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- RE: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- Re: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- RE: [RSS-DEV] RSS 1.1
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- VIP-Booking.com Lite Newsletter Volume 63 - 18/01/2005
Tuesday, 18 January 2005
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit 1.4.4
- David Garc(wrong
- RSS 1.1
- Re: RX - another RDF in XML format [WAS: Re: a simpler form of rdf xml]
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
Monday, 17 January 2005
- RX - another RDF in XML format [WAS: Re: a simpler form of rdf xml]
- Re: XMLLiterals and language
- XMLLiterals and language
Sunday, 16 January 2005
- W3C RDF docs admin comments
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Rasqal RDF Query Library 0.9.5
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
Saturday, 15 January 2005
- Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?
- Triples Anyone? / Base Real World Concepts / Semantics2
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Raptor RDF Parser Toolkit 1.4.4
- Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: RDF and RDFS Schemas?
Friday, 14 January 2005
- RE: RDF and RDFS Schemas?
- RE: RDF and RDFS Schemas?
- Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?
- Re: RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?
- SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- RXR, TriplesXML or TriX? Anyone?
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
Thursday, 13 January 2005
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- CFP: RTAS WIP 2005
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- CFP: Semantic Infrastructure for Grid Computing Applications Workshop at CCGrid 2005 -- Deadline Extended
- PERL Bug hunters? Re: A testing tool - MUTAT coming alive
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- RE: xml datatype facets
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: xml datatype facets
- RE: xml datatype facets
- RE: xml datatype facets
- Re: xml without rdf, but with an ontology [0]
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- RE: xml datatype facets
- Re: xml datatype facets
- Re: a simpler form of rdf xml
- Re: xml datatype facets
- Re: Scheduled CWM/N3 Meeting: 2005-01-26 18:00 UTC
- Re: Scheduled CWM/N3 Meeting: 2005-01-26 18:00 UTC
- Scheduled CWM/N3 Meeting: 2005-01-26 18:00 UTC
Wednesday, 12 January 2005
Thursday, 13 January 2005
Wednesday, 12 January 2005
- ESWC 2005: Cf Posters and Software Demos
- Re: RDF and RDFS Schemas?
- Re: RDF and RDFS Schemas?
- RDF and RDFS Schemas?
- xml datatype facets
- RE: classification inferences based on owl:disjointWith
- Re: classification inferences based on owl:disjointWith
Tuesday, 11 January 2005
- classification inferences based on owl:disjointWith
- Re: Protege and the Multilanguage support
- Short research positions at The Poznan University of Economics, Poland - Tools for ontologies
- Protege and the Multilanguage support
- RE: RDF version of IETF RFC metadata (and relationship to FOAF fi les? )
- New release of InferEd RDF Editor
Monday, 10 January 2005
- comments on DPF
- Re: XML or RDF lexicons
- Re: XML or RDF lexicons
- Re: XML or RDF lexicons
- RE: RDF version of IETF RFC metadata (and relationship to FOAF fi les? )
- Re: XML or RDF lexicons
- RE: RDF version of IETF RFC metadata (and relationship to FOAF fi les? )
- Re: XML or RDF lexicons
- Re: XML or RDF lexicons
- XML or RDF lexicons
- final call for paper TIA 2005
Sunday, 9 January 2005
- Post-Doc position-University of Fribourg Switzerland
- Fwd: Please Review: Dissemination of Earthquake / Tsunami data via Atom
Saturday, 8 January 2005
- Re: Would an Atom-RDF mapping be useful?
- Re: RDF version of IETF RFC metadata (and relationship to FOAF fi les? )
Friday, 7 January 2005
- Re: Would an Atom-RDF mapping be useful?
- Would an Atom-RDF mapping be useful?
- Re: Object triple Mapping
- RE: To RDF or not to RDF, that is the (perennial) question
- To RDF or not to RDF
- Deadline today! [ANN] Reminder: Call for Participation, XTech 2005, 24-27 May, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- RE: Semantic web help
- Fwd: To RDF or not to RDF, that is the (perennial) question
- Re: Semantic web help
- Re: Semantic web help
- Re: Semantic web help
- Re: Semantic web help
- CSWIG '04 papers available
Thursday, 6 January 2005
- Semantic web help
- Re: RDF too geeky, and what to do about it
- Re: RDF too geeky, and what to do about it
- RE: RDF version of IETF RFC metadata (and relationship to FOAF fi les? )
- Re: RDF version of IETF RFC metadata (and relationship to FOAF files? )
Wednesday, 5 January 2005
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- RDF version of IETF RFC metadata (and relationship to FOAF files? )
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- Re: Exchange of Named RDF Graphs
- KES2005 CfP