- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:29:43 +0100
- To: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
On 4 Feb 2005, at 16:01, Ian Davis wrote:
> On 04/02/2005 13:50, Henry Story wrote:
>> Ok. But it is very clearly not what the original author
>> of the xml intended. Since
>> - if the blank_predicates for both statements are the same then
>> you would be saying that there is a country that is related in
>> the same way to the string "Canada" and "France".
>
> I would assume that two separate country elements would produce two
> separate blank nodes of type country:
>
> (blank_node1) - (blank_predicate1) --> "Canada"
> (blank_node1) - type --> country
> (blank_node2) - (blank_predicate1) --> "France"
> (blank_node2) - type --> country
Ok. I had not read that into the original mail. But if this was the
intention then indeed it
looks a lot more promising.
I had tried to generalise that to the fullest in a post to this mailing
list [1],
but had got stuck. For want of time I have not been able to find a way
out of the
problems there described. I don't think it is impossible though, just I
have to work
on other things in the mean time.
Henry Story
[1] see the section below the BROKEN THOUGHT warning:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2005Jan/0130.html
Received on Friday, 4 February 2005 15:30:14 UTC