- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:00:18 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Andrew Newman <andrew@tucanatech.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Andrew Newman wrote: >The main problem we've had with named graphs is that it can be a pain on >a machine that has multiple names or names that change over time. If I >create a models based on machine names called "http://192.168.10.1/foo" >and then move to another network and suddenly it's >"http://10.0.0.42/foo" then all my existing queries stop working. I now >prefer URNs for models not URIs and add a level of indirection between >them (I think this has been mentioned before). That just feels like a bug - at least at the usability level. Surely it is sensible to change machines and be able to use the same data (at least as a possiblity and I would have thought even as a default) including queries? chaals
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 12:00:18 UTC