Re: Upcoming wave of quad/namedgraph implementations ,was: Reification - whats best practice? from Kendall Clark on 2004-09-10 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from September 2004)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:14:31 -0400
To: Damian Steer <damian.steer@hp.com>
Cc: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, "<www-rdf-interest@w3.org>" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20040910111431.GB4815@monkeyfist.com>

On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:37:42AM +0100, Damian Steer wrote:

> A quick follow up on this: I think it might be useful if people who 
> need the ability to track the source(s) of a statement could provide 
> use cases for dawg <mailto:public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>. I know 
> Phil Dawes has a use case, mentioned at foaf galway.
> 
> DAWG people: Is this a good idea?

Yes.

Best,
Kendall Clark (speaking as DAWG use cases document editor)

Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 11:16:28 UTC